Å·ÃÀÈÕb´óƬ

Skip to Main Navigation
PRESS RELEASE

Global Trade Logistics Performance Slows Down Amid Recession and Major Events

May 15, 2012




But many countries like Chile, China, India, Morocco, South Africa, and the U.S. continued to improve

WASHINGTON, May 15, 2012¡ªProgress in trade logistics performance slowed down over the last two years amid the global recession, but countries that pursued aggressive reforms continued to improve their performance, according to the World Bank¡¯s latest survey on trade logistics.
 
Singapore is the top performer among the 155 economies included in the Logistics Performance Indicators (LPI), which are part of the Connecting to Compete 2012: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy report. Countries like Chile, China, India, Morocco, South Africa, Turkey, and the U.S. all improved their previous performance, according to the study, which is based on a comprehensive world survey of international freight forwarders and express carriers.
 
¡°Trade logistics is key to economic competitiveness, growth, and poverty reduction,¡±
said Otaviano Canuto, World Bank Vice President for Poverty Reduction and Economic Management (PREM). ¡°Unfortunately, the logistics gap between rich and poor countries continues and the convergence trend experienced between 2007 and 2010 has stalled as events like the global recession, and the European debt crisis shifted attention away from logistics reform.¡±

According to the LPI, high income economies dominate the top logistics rankings, while the economies with the worst performance are least developed countries that are also often landlocked, small islands, or post-conflict states. Nevertheless, logistics performance is not simply determined by the level of per capita income, as many countries across different income groups have done better than their peers.
 
In the upper-middle income country category, top performers include South Africa, China and Turkey. In the lower middle income category, India, Morocco and the Philippines have above average performance improvements. And among low-income countries, outperformers included Benin, Malawi and Madagascar.
 
¡°Infrastructure stands out as the chief driver of progress in top performers, followed by improvements in logistics services, and customs and border management,¡± said Mona Haddad, Sector Manager of the World Bank¡¯s International Trade Department. ¡°All top performers show strong cooperation between the public and private sectors, and a comprehensive approach in the development of services, infrastructure and efficient logistics.¡±
 
The survey shows while logistics services have improved compared to past surveys, rail services dissatisfied more than 90 percent of respondents. On the border management side, customs agencies got better ratings than all other agencies involved in the process, with those responsible for sanitary and phytosanitary regulations lagging behind.
 
Better logistics needed to reduce food prices and carbon footprint
 
At a time where food prices are at historic highs, the survey also found that logistics is important for food security. Transport and logistics directly affect the price and local availability of food through the performance and resilience of food chains, especially in African and Middle Eastern countries that depend heavily on food imports.
 
In developing countries, particularly in landlocked and poor ones, transport and logistics account for 20-60 percent of delivered food prices. For instance, they make up 48 percent of the cost of U.S. corn imported by Nicaragua.
 
The survey, which for the first time included environmental indicators, also found that green logistics is quickly gaining prominence in high-income and emerging economies ¨Ca positive development since logistics and freight-related activities may account for up to 15 percent of human carbon dioxide emissions. Large logistics providers like DHL, FedEx, UPS, and TNT, all now have global initiatives to reduce their carbon footprint, shift to more efficient vehicles, make facilities more efficient,  and help clients become more green-friendly
 
The way forward
 
The 2012 LPI shows preconditions for efficient logistics.  All top performers have developed and maintained a strong public-private partnership and dialogue; good cooperation between policymakers, practioners, administrators and academics; and a comprehensive approach in the development of transport services, infrastructure and efficient logistics.
 
Only by fostering cooperation between the public and private sectors, and by considering the impact of all agencies on the supply chain can a country create sustainable improvements in its logistical capabilities, the study says.
 
What the World Bank is doing to help improve trade logistics

  • Projects dealing with logistics and trade facilitation constitute about 10 percent of the World Bank¡¯s overall portfolio.
  • Examples of these projects include customs reforms, trade development, and regional and corridor projects. In Africa, for instance, the $300 million East Africa Trade and Transport Facilitation Project improved the corridor infrastructure and upgraded the main border crossing between Uganda and Kenya at Malaba. The project reduced border crossing times from three days to three hours between 2006 and 2012.
  • The Trade Facilitation Facility, a donor-funded technical assistance initiative of $50 million, is helping low-income countries improve their logistics projects and trade-related infrastructure.
  • Å·ÃÀÈÕb´óƬ is also working with:
    • Other international partners involved in projects, including  regional development banks,  UNCTAD, and the World Customs Organizations, all of which are members of the  Global Facilitation Partnership.
    • Regional groups of countries and forums like the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), among others.
    • Private organizations and companies promoting good practices, including the international Road Union, and the International Federation of Freight Forwarders Associations.
    • The World Economic Forum to analyze the potential for multilaterally agreed measures to boost logistics service delivery and the efficiency of global supply chains. The WEF also uses the LPI as an input into its competitiveness indicators.

LPI ranking and scores 2012*

 

Rank

Score

% of
highest
performer

  Rank

Score

% of
highest
performer

 

Rank

Score

% of
highest
performer

Singapore

1 4.13 100.0

Uruguay

56 2.98 63.5

Venezuela, RB

111 2.49 47.7

Hong Kong
SAR, China

2 4.12 99.9

Egypt, Arab
Rep.

57 2.98 63.3

Iran, Islamic Rep.

112 2.49 47.6

Finland

3 4.05 97.6

Lithuania

58 2.95 62.3

Paraguay

113 2.48 47.4

Germany

4 4.03 97.0

Indonesia

59 2.94 62.2

S?o Tom¨¦ and Pr¨ªncipe

114 2.48 47.4

Netherlands

5 4.02 96.7

Peru

60 2.94 61.9

Guinea

115 2.48 47.4

Denmark

6 4.02 96.6

Panama

61 2.93 61.9

Azerbaijan

116 2.48 47.4

Belgium

7 3.98 95.3

Oman

62 2.89 60.4

Uzbekistan

117 2.46 46.9

Japan

8 3.93 93.8

Yemen,
Rep.

63 2.89 60.3

Gambia,
The

118 2.46 46.8

United States

9 3.93 93.7

Colombia

64 2.87 59.8

Liberia

119 2.45 46.3

United
Kingdom

10 3.90 92.7

Estonia

65 2.86 59.5

Montenegro

120 2.45 46.3

Austria

11 3.89 92.5

Ukraine

66 2.85 59.3

Nigeria

121 2.45 46.3

France

12 3.85 91.2

Benin

67 2.85 59.3

Kenya

122 2.43 45.9

Sweden

13 3.85 91.2

Botswana

68 2.84 58.9

Fiji

123 2.42 45.4

Canada

14 3.85 91.1

Greece

69 2.83 58.6

Jamaica

124 2.42 45.3

Luxembourg

15 3.82 90.3

Kuwait

70 2.83 58.5

Algeria

125 2.41 45.3

Switzerland

16 3.80 89.7

Pakistan

71 2.83 58.4

Solomon Islands

126 2.41 45.2

United Arab
Emirates

17 3.78 88.9

Mauritius

72 2.82 58.2

Mauritania

127 2.40 44.7

Australia

18 3.73 87.2

Malawi

73 2.81 57.8

Papua New Guinea

128 2.38 44.0

Taiwan,
China

19 3.71 86.6

Guatemala

74 2.80 57.7

Myanmar

129 2.37 43.8

Spain

20 3.70 86.4

Serbia

75 2.80 57.6

Kyrgyz Republic

130 2.35 43.3

Korea, Rep.

21 3.70 86.2

Latvia

76 2.78 56.9

Gabon

131 2.34 43.0

Norway

22 3.68 85.9

Georgia

77 2.77 56.8

Moldova

132 2.33 42.6

South Africa

23 3.67 85.5

Albania

78 2.77 56.7

Guyana

133 2.33 42.5

Italy

24 3.67 85.4

Ecuador

79 2.76 56.2

Burkina
Faso

134 2.32 42.3

Ireland

25 3.52 80.6

Bahamas, The

80 2.75 56.1

Afghanistan

135 2.30 41.5

China

26 3.52 80.5

Sri Lanka

81 2.75 56.0

Tajikistan

136 2.28 41.1

Turkey

27 3.51 80.3

Costa Rica

82 2.75 55.9

Libya

137 2.28 41.0

Portugal

28 3.50 80.1

C?te d¡¯Ivoire

83 2.73 55.4

Angola

138 2.28 40.8

Malaysia

29 3.49 79.8

Madagascar

84 2.72 55.1

Rwanda

139 2.27 40.5

Poland

30 3.43 77.8

Dominican
Republic

85 2.70 54.4

Mongolia

140 2.25 40.0

New Zealand

31 3.42 77.4

Kazakhstan

86 2.69 54.2

Ethiopia

141 2.24 39.6

Iceland

32 3.39 76.6

Niger

87 2.69 54.1

Lesotho

142 2.24 39.5

Qatar

33 3.32 74.3

Tanzania

88 2.65 52.9

Congo, Dem. Rep.

143 2.21 38.6

Slovenia

34 3.29 73.1

Namibia

89 2.65 52.9

Cuba

144 2.20 38.3

Cyprus

35 3.24 71.8

Bolivia

90 2.61 51.6

Iraq

145 2.16 37.1

Bulgaria

36 3.21 70.7

Belarus

91 2.61 51.6

Comoros

146 2.14 36.5

Saudi Arabia

37 3.18 69.7

Syrian
Arab Republic

92 2.60 51.3

Eritrea

147 2.11 35.5

Thailand

38 3.18 69.6

El Salvador

93 2.60 51.2

Sudan

148 2.10 35.3

Chile

39 3.17 69.5

Guinea-
Bissau

94 2.60 51.1

Congo, Rep.

149 2.08 34.7

Hungary

40 3.17 69.5

Russian
Federation

95 2.58 50.7

Sierra Leone

150 2.08 34.5

Tunisia

41 3.17 69.4

Lebanon

96 2.58 50.6

Nepal

151 2.04 33.1

Croatia

42 3.16 69.2

Togo

97 2.58 50.5

Chad

152 2.03 32.9

Malta

43 3.16 69.0

Central
African
Republic

98 2.57 50.3

Haiti

153 2.03 32.8

Czech
Republic

44 3.14 68.5

Macedonia,
FYR

99 2.56 50.1

Djibouti

154 1.80 25.5

Brazil

45 3.13 68.2

Armenia

100 2.56 50.0

Burundi

155 1.61 19.5

India

46 3.08 66.4

Cambodia

101 2.56 50.0        

Mexico

47 3.06 66.0

Jordan

102 2.56 49.8        

Bahrain

48 3.05 65.7

Zimbabwe

103 2.55 49.6        

Argentina

49 3.05 65.5

Maldives

104 2.55 49.4        

Morocco

50 3.03 65.5

Honduras

105 2.53 49.1        

Slovak
Republic

51 3.03 64.9

Cameroon

106 2.53 48.9        

Philippines

52 3.02 64.8

Bhutan

107 2.52 48.6        

Vietnam

53 3.00 64.1

Ghana

108 2.51

48.2

       

Romania

54 3.00 63.8

Lao PDR

109 2.50 48.0        

Bosnia and
Herzegovinav

55 2.99 63.5

Senegal

110 2.49 47.7        

*Scores are provided on a 1 (worst) to 5 (best possible) scale of performance.
The column ¡°% of best performer¡± represents the relative LPI and is obtained by normalizing the LPI score. In this way, the best performer reaches the maximum score of 100% and the worst performer the minimum of 19.5%

Media Contacts
In Washington
Alejandra Viveros
Tel : + 1 (202) 473-4306
Aviveros@worldbank.org
Michael Jelenic
Tel : +1 (202) 473-2075
Mjelenic@worldbank.org
Mehreen A. Sheikh
Tel : + (202) 413-9204
Msheikh1@worldbank.org


PRESS RELEASE NO:
2012/446/PREM

Api
Api