Non-Active Client Countries
Belarus
FinSAC provided technical assistance to Belarus from 2017 to 2019 focused on improving the bank resolution framework and strengthening the deposit insurance framework. In 2019, FinSAC provided an assessment of cybersecurity regulations for further consideration by the authorities.
Bulgaria
In 2014, FinSAC provided technical assistance to the Banking Supervision Department of the Bulgaria National Bank focused on strengthening the supervision of loan quality and advising on the transition of loan classification and provisioning standards to International Financial Reporting Standards. Å·ÃÀÈÕb´óƬ Financial Projection Model was provided as a tool to assess the condition and viability of Bulgarian banks, allowing supervisors to analyze and simulate banks¡¯ performance for regulatory analysis and stress-testing purposes. A FinSAC conference in partnership with the Bulgarian Financial Services Commission was held in Sofia, Bulgaria on Consumer Protection and Financial Literacy in June 2014.
Croatia
FinSAC organized a crisis simulation exercise for the Croatian authorities in February 2013 as an opportunity to practice responding to distress in the financial system and to explore the adequacy of existing laws, regulations, policies, and procedures. The exercise tested the decision-making process and communications between the National Bank, the State Agency for Deposit Insurance and Bank Rehabilitation, the Ministry of Finance, and the Croatian Financial Services Supervisory Agency.
Also in 2013, FinSAC carried out a thorough assessment of the existing Croatian bank resolution framework and a gap analysis with European Union requirements and good international practice. In 2014/15, FinSAC and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development worked together on two projects in Croatia. The first proposed amendments to the Croatian ¡°Personal Insolvency Law¡± at the request of the Ministry of Justice, and the second offered support and technical assistance in the area of nonperforming loan resolution. FinSAC also provided support and capacity-building for judges and insolvency professionals.
Poland
In February 2015, a World Bank/Polish Bank Guarantee Fund Seminar on ¡°Challenges for European Deposit Insurance Systems: Funding, Investment Practices and Reimbursement¡± took place in Warsaw. Specialists from 16 countries, including the United Kingdom, Romania, Croatia, Bulgaria, Finland, Hungary, and Poland, the European Commission, and the EBA shared their knowledge and experience of deposit insurance systems, especially funding, investment, and payout procedures.
Serbia
In 2011/12 FinSAC helped the Supervision Department of National Bank of Serbia related to the establishment of a new unit responsible for the supervision of IT-related operational risk. This included comprehensive training, drafting of regulations, preparing a three-year institution-building plan, and the design of on-site and off-site supervision procedures. In 2013, FinSAC assessed the existing Serbian bank resolution framework. A gap analysis with European Union requirements and good international practice identified areas to be addressed to strengthen bank resolution. Between 2013 and 2015, FinSAC supported the National Bank of Serbia to improve the effectiveness of onsite prudential and anti-money laundering supervision practices. FinSAC also advised on the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and improving the efficiency of the Supervisory Review and Examination Process (SREP). In 2016/17, FinSAC worked with the National Bank of Serbia on strengthening supervisory stress-testing capability and analytical abilities to assess the quality of the stress tests done by banks in the context of capital planning. In 2018, FinSAC assessed the Serbian deposit insurance system against the International Association of Deposit Insurers¡¯ core principles and advised on areas for strengthening, including a target fund size model. In 2019, FinSAC prepared a report on the financial health of corporations in Serbia to strengthen the authorities¡¯ capacity to formulate an operational strategy for dealing with nonperforming loans.