Å·ÃÀÈÕb´óƬ

Measuring Russia¡¯s Comprehensive Wealth from 2000-2017

Russia, the world¡¯s largest transcontinental country and spanning eleven time zones, is richly endowed with natural resources. This vast country plays a crucial role in global energy and resource markets, and is the main trading partner for many of its neighbors.

Russia holds the world¡¯s largest natural gas reserves, the second largest coal reserves, and the eighth largest oil reserves. It is one of the largest producers and exporters of natural gas, the third largest oil producer, and the second largest oil exporter.

But how wealthy is Russia? How does Russia¡¯s wealth compare to other countries? And how are the returns on this wealth distributed amongst Russian citizens?

In 2017, the average Russian citizen was 1.8 times wealthier than in 2000. But despite strong growth, Russia¡¯s per capita wealth is still only about a quarter than in OECD countries. From 2000¨C2017, Russia¡¯s per capita wealth grew multiple times faster than that of high-income countries, but from a much lower base. The performance in per capita wealth growth was uneven, however, and has weakened in recent years due to stagnant growth in human capital and the decline in oil and gas wealth.

On average, Russia¡¯s ¡°return on wealth¡± ¨C the ratio of GDP to wealth ¨C has been around 7 percent for the 2000¨C2017 period, which is similar to the average of upper middle-income and high-income countries. However, it is lower than the 8-10 percent return on wealth in Eastern European countries such as Bulgaria, Hungary, and Poland.

Measuring the evolution of two measures of shared prosperity ¨C income growth of the bottom 40 percent of the population, and growth in median income ¨C reveals that, while sizeable during the boom years, Russia¡¯s shared prosperity premium has been shrinking in recent years.

Human capital comprises the largest share of wealth in Russia, at 46 percent. By comparison, human capital comprises 70 percent of wealth composition in OECD countries. During 2000¨C2017, Russia¡¯s human capital wealth per capita grew rapidly, but has slowed during the last ten years. If Russia¡¯s human capital continues to grow at its 2000¨C2017 average rate of 3.5 percent, it will take about 50 years to catch up with the OECD.

Russia¡¯s dependence on its non-renewable assets poses a specific development challenge, with its large share of carbon-based wealth facing increased risk due to future price uncertainty and large-scale attempts at global decarbonization. To maximize the return on wealth, Russia¡¯s needs policies that rebalance its wealth portfolio. 

Policy Directions

Diversifying the Wealth Portfolio

Rebalancing the portfolio and mitigating the risks of stranded assets will require Russia to diversify its wealth portfolio away from its fossil fuel sector and towards other productive capital, in particular, human capital. This will involve, in the short-term, maintaining the fiscal rule ¨C a necessary though not sufficient condition for diversification.

The new fiscal rule has substantially curbed the economy from oil price volatility, and in order to further entrench its credibility, it will be important to refrain from investment of the National Welfare Fund in domestic assets.

Sustaining Focus on Human Capital

A sustained policy focus on increasing the share of human capital and increasing returns on the stock of human capital wealth will help. Measures to improve Russia¡¯s human capital performance (education and health) include the following: further developing Russia¡¯s university education potential; improving the quality of Russia¡¯s vocational education system; improving problem-solving skills of Russian students; emphasizing primary care disease detection and prevention; and increasing health care efficiency and financing.

Increasing Produced Capital

Russia¡¯s produced capital per capita is almost a fourth of the OECD average. Increasing produced capital would require improving the investment climate, which could be done through creating a level playing field for firms, enhancing competition conditions, and streamlining regulatory requirements.

This would mean: reversing the trend towards cartelization of the economy, especially in public procurement; promoting competitive neutrality principles among state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private sector actors; and ensuring the transparency of state support and privileges to minimize competition distortions.

Better Managing Natural Capital

Although renewable resources make up a smaller share of Russia¡¯s natural capital, they can produce benefits in perpetuity if managed sustainably. An immediate priority is reducing forest fires, which are the main factor driving forest loss. Russia is home to 20 percent of the world¡¯s forest resources, and between 2015-2018, fires on both forest and non-forest lands increased 2.4 times.

Another area is ¡°green finance¡±, which could help mobilize the required funding for financing sustainable growth. As a rough approximation, in 2017 Russia's forests (excluding reserve forests) provided absorption of more than 638 million tons of CO₂ equivalent or around 30,000 billion rubles (over US$ 500 billion).

Distributing Returns on Wealth More Equitably

The waxing and waning of two measures of shared prosperity ¨C growth in incomes of the bottom 40 percent of the population, and median income ¨C coupled with the overall macro-economic conditions, underscores the importance of increasing returns to Russia¡¯s wealth, as well as pursuing policies that distribute these returns more equitably.